Comment

Search is all part of a full service offering

Platform: None | Source: NMA magazine | Published: 26.10.06

Email article | Printer Friendly | Comment on this articlemore Comment

From Kevin Murphy, planning director of Zed

I nearly choked on my coffee twice while reading last week's front page story on how search specialists are feeling the heat as media agencies muscle in (NMA 19.10.06).

I don't know what nearly necessitated the Heimlich manoeuvre more: digital-only agency i-level finally conceding that "forward-thinking" clients realise the importance of investing in an integrated agency so there's "one point of call when planning ahead,...

Article continues below

... comparing strategies and so on", or Latitude saying search "is not a media buy".

I couldn't agree more with i-level, but has it forgotten that 'full service' should refer to offline as well as online? I know digital media is rising fast, but the last time I checked offline media was still taking more than its fair share of ad spend.

I think Latitude's comments just edge it onto the comedy scale. So search isn't a media buy. So it won't work more efficiently when co-ordinating with other online and offline media activity. Does it not work more efficiently with tactics like day-part weighting? Is there no skill or technique in choosing which keywords to use, what bid costs to pay or whether a visibility or cost efficiency strategy is required? Correct me if I'm wrong, but the answer to all these questions is yes, which surely places search easily within the remit of a channel requiring a media strategy. If I was a client of Latitude and I'd read its comments, I'd be alarmed. I'd then pick up the phone and call a media agency, one that truly lives and breathes the full spectrum of media across offline and online.