Video advertising
The key difference between online and TV is that the web allows users to interact with what they see. Online video ads should take advantage of this and get viewers involved
quick facts
- In 2008, the total UK online video viewing audience grew 10% to 29.6m unique viewers over the age of 15
- Sites such as YouTube have helped to ensure creativity, not budget, is the key to compelling video advertising
- WKD saw a 248% uplift in traffic in the first week of its Kev ‘n’ Dave online video campaign, and more than 3,500 questions have been asked to date
- Creative use of video formats is as crucial as the content. InSkin ads achieve an average click-through rate of 3%
In 2008 the total UK online video viewing audience grew 10% to 29.6m unique viewers over the age of 15, according to ComScore in January. In line with this, Forrester Research predicts the global online video advertising market will reach $7.2bn (£4.36bn) by 2012. But as viewers migrate from TV to online and an increasing number of advertisers follow, it’s ever more important for brands to innovate in order to be seen.
Most online video advertising has consisted of pre-roll and post-roll, and too much content has been repurposed TV footage. This is the wrong approach, says Debs Carter, beverage brands marketing director at alcoholic drinks company WKD. “The world our consumers inhabit is constantly innovating. If we churn out the same media response, they get desensitised and bored. We have to constantly be where they are, and surprise and delight them by doing the unexpected,” she says.
There can be no excuses. Glyn Britton, strategy director at ad agency Albion, says we’ve witnessed a “democratisation” of video production. “You used to have to have a big budget, find the right production company and take the time,” he says. “Now you can pick up a broadcast-quality camera, film something, edit it, get it out there and see if it works. It’s a more level playing field and the most creative ideas will prosper.”
Last year Albion worked on a low-budget online video campaign for Skype’s range of mobile services, called Skype Nomad (nma 9 May 2008). It featured a woman travelling around the world for 33 days, filming herself on a handheld camera. She posted more than 300 videos on YouTube, many of which achieved between 5,000 and 10,000 views. The approach was intended to test the Skype product in a punishing way and demonstrate how it can keep people connected wherever they are. “By traditional creative standards it’s one of the least remarkable concepts, but one that got the most views on YouTube,” says Britton. “The context is creative. I think the 33-day product demo, with the twist that she couldn’t stop moving, was the context that made a pretty unremarkable video remarkable.”
One of the key tools for innovation with online video advertising is interaction, something for which the medium is tailor-made and which sets it apart from TV. Think Bob Dylan’s ‘Subterranean Homesick Blues’ video perpetuated on Facebook, with users able to change the words on the cards Dylan holds up, or the video ad for Philips’ Cinema 21:0 TV, which allows viewers to click on hot spots and go behind the scenes (see box below).
Dave Katz, joint head of the video integration unit at media agency MPG, says, “The best video ads let viewers do something within them to experience the brand for themselves. Brands using the web as a passive medium are missing the point. It’s an active medium within which users can participate. They often expect to do so when they’re surfing for entertainment, so why not allow them to participate when they see a great ad?”
WKD’s latest ad campaign, Kev ‘n’ Dave, allows people to type in any question they choose. A video of the two eponymous characters answering & albeit randomly as a result of 200 possible scenarios which are filmed and categorised & plays in response. WKD saw a 248% uplift in traffic in the first week of Kev ‘n’ Dave going live and more than 3,500 questions have been asked to date. “Our planning work shows that WKD’s target audience wants to see engaging and unexpected rich-media content from the brand,” says Carter. “Our target audience of 18-25-year-olds are particularly hard to please and have a higher expectation, so you need to be innovative.”
Fitting the context
Brands also need to bear in mind the viewing experience of the user when creating content, however mind-blowing it is. Jamie Estrin, MD of video advertising and technology company The Web TV Enterprise, says it depends on the user’s state of mind as well as the length of the content the ad is being placed around. “The creative execution could vary if the user is watching catch-up TV as a lean-back viewing experience, for example,” he says.
Xavier Rees, deputy MD of marketing agency TBCH, which has produced online video ads for mobile operator 3, agrees that context is key. “The industry needs to find a way to create video advertising that makes the most of the online media it inhabits and is shaped around how online video is consumed,” he says. “So video that you can interact with, customise or even have a dialogue with has to be the direction in which to go.”
But even getting creative content and context right isn’t enough. Using different and appropriate formats is also key to standing out, and greater experimentation is needed by brands in this area. “The media industry knows pre-roll ads aren’t the solution, but what is?” asks Rees. “It’ll be interesting to see how the big guns innovate in this area and what they pull out of the ether.”
InSkin believes it has found one answer. Its ads wrap advertisers’ branding and messaging around a website’s video player. The ad remains visible for the duration of playback, achieving an average brand exposure of three minutes per impression, even if the user doesn’t click through to the advertiser’s site. “No other online ad format offers this level of brand dwell time,” claims Hugo Drayton, CEO of InSkin. “Additionally, InSkin ads create an average click-through rate of 3%, making it one of the best performing video ad units for response.”
The Daily Telegraph is one convert. Last December it decided to re-evaluate the ad formats it was offering advertisers on its Telegraph TV site. The editorial team had reservations about the impact on the user experience of certain formats, and the commercial team needed more effective advertising and bigger numbers than traditional pre-roll and post-roll slots could provide.
“I like the way InSkin manages to be very impactful yet unobtrusive,” says Mike Nicholson, manager of Telegraph TV. “It would be very difficult for the user to ever miss, but it doesn’t hinder their viewing experience in the slightest. Also, by allowing the user to choose the time they would like to click, you put them in control of their web experience and the results have produced substantial ROI for several clients.” One fashion brand sponsored Telegraph TV’s weekly fashion programme using InSkin and achieved an interaction rate of 14%.
Video search engine Blinkx has also launched an online video ad format called Un-roll. The unit begins with a branded curtain that draws back to reveal the video. As this plays, touchpoints such as overlay ads and logos appear within the video, and the viewer has the option to continue the experience on the brand’s website. At the end, users can replay or share the video.
Network specialist Cisco is one company using Un-roll. “We get high impact contextual placement of our messages and this kind of innovation will become more important as video continues to dominate web growth,” says Tim Shorrocks, Cisco UK and Ireland marketing director.
Two things are clear: creativity is now more important than budget, and the unique strengths of online must be leveraged within video advertising. “The answer is to approach online video advertising as a different medium to TV advertising,” says InSkin’s Drayton. “This will drive increased creativity and higher quality advertising, designed for the web with specific campaign goals.” Innovation, not replication, is the future.
Philips produces arresting ad for widescreen TV
In April 2009 Philips launched ‘Carousel’, an online video ad to promote its Cinema 21:9 widescreen TV.
Produced by Stink Digital in conjunction with agency Tribal DDB Amsterdam, the ad is a two-minute freeze-frame of a gun fight. The camera moves around the chaotic scene, but all the characters remain eerily frozen mid action. The film has been posted on YouTube and Facebook, but viewers who watch at the Philips website, cinema.philips.com, can also see an interactive version that allows them to go behind the scenes, see how it was made and view additional footage.
“We hired stuntmen and people with good core body strength who could freeze for periods of time, then ran the camera between the scenes,” says Mark Pytlik, executive producer at Stink Digital. “We shot at 50 frames per second instead of the usual 25 so if anyone moved it was less noticeable.”
In just over two weeks, 500,000 unique visitors visited the Philips website, spending an average of 5 minutes 20 seconds viewing the footage, and 50% of those interacted with it.
Gary Raucher, VP and head of integrated communications at Philips says, “In order for people to understand the benefit of the widescreen they need to experience it. The good thing is that most people are saying, ‘Here’s the film but if you want to really experience it go to the Philips site.’ “
The interactive hotspots allow viewers to see the director of photography talking about the importance of light and the director talking about why 21:9 is the preferred cinematic aspect ratio. “It’s a great way to talk about the reason to believe our product can deliver such great benefits, while giving people a reason to visit the Philips site,” says Raucher.
Most popular
-
Facebook to launch first mobile ads within weeks
-
Google collaborates with industry on UK graduate scheme
-
Guardian.co.uk is news site with most tracking cookies
-
Two thirds of businesses have low confidence in their long-term digital strategy
-
Twitter will be a better channel for social commerce than Facebook
Most commented
Most emailed
-
Sky's non-subscriber VOD service could flatten the market
-
Opinion: The Digital Standards Trading Group will be welcomed
-
Zeebox launches click-to-buy TV ad service
-
Video ads designed specifically for digital boost purchase intent by 25%
-
Zeebox's transactional TV ad service marks future of cross-media advertising


Readers' comments (7)
Jackie | Thu, 23 Jul 2009 2:41 pm
Whilst the article confirms everything we have believed about online video, the next generation of TV is internet TV. The ability to transform content, on websites in to something worth engaging with. This is not just rolling adverts on other sites to attract people to your website (which is still stuck within the limits of old style websites, photos, copy etc.) this is the ability to have a full on sales channel with all the interactivity that the web has to offer with the pleasure that TV has brought us. The world is shifting quicker than we realise, quality content does not need to be expensive - that was the old model of agencies, production companies and everyone else all taking a slice of the budget. Adaptable and effective does not have to be huge and expensive, but there is no substitute for professional content.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Patrick Holtkamp / WAX Agency | Thu, 23 Jul 2009 3:00 pm
Great to see online video advertising moving into the limelight. We have been talking to brands for a while about "Story/Entertainment Driven Marketing" and incorporating interactive elements. If done right this creates a unique and rich experience for the user they will not forget for a while and you can provide the data to prove it. Move over TV. Move over old school advertising and make room for creative, innovative and instant forms of digital engagement. We are working on some exciting "brand narrative" video campaigns ourselves and the results are in line with the ones in the article.
Online Video killed the TV Star !!?? Maybe. Just maybe.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Justin Gayner / Co-Founder, ChannelFlip.com | Thu, 23 Jul 2009 7:17 pm
I quite agree with the urgent need to migrate from 30 second TV spots. Having published over 1000 videos with a variety ad formats we've found users are at their happiest with no more than 5 seconds of pre-roll.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:47 am
Mashing up tv material, putting it to music and mashing advertising into it strikes me as the next big thing. It could launch from a music streaming site. People click on a track and instead of just listening to it they can choose a mixture of tv and film clips to randomly (or not) play in tune with the music. They might listen to mozart and watch war footage, or Bjork to coronation street...
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
justin weily | Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:25 am
An outsiders ad agency rant
3 years ago we spent $50 000 making a tv series about British Gap year students visiting Australia.
We were happy doing that, it was a lot of fun !
It aired on TV in the UK, we sold 2000 DVDs and viral videos flow here, there and everywhere.
200 000 UK kids make this particular trip (Syndey to Cairns) EVERY YEAR so there's quite a market for this little TV series.
This TV series (13 x 23 mins) now resides (a few eps anyway) on a WEBTV platform. We plan to release the entire series FREE if we get an airline, tourism body or brand wishing to target youngsters involved (and their disposable incomes)! This way the little darlings can gobble up all the FREE videos they want (because we all know they don't really want to pay) and why should they?
We're not asking a fortune by the way, a few thousand a year would suffice.
Not really rocket science !
One would think this project has potential for a 'neat little tie in' with an airline that flies regularly from the UK to Australia, heck they'd only have to sell 10 air fares and they'd break even, but do you think any of the ad agencies that represent these airlines answer emails and phone calls?
Not a chance.
These airlines or travel boards (I'm thinking tourism Australia would probably be a good fit ) would surely gain lots of publicity from pre-roll video ads playing before the FREE TV episodes play.
Again...not really rocket science !
Until governments, airlines, enter brand here realise that ideas are actually conceived outside the protected walls of incumbent ad agencies, independent producers making money (or even making online video campaigns) is not going to happen.
It's the brands that are missing out on cheap (but not nasty) online video advertising opportunities but I guess it's easier, more expensive and more fun for ad agencies to spend their clients cash on big offices in trendy districts, meetings, 'think tanks', surveys, lunches, media drinks (I could go on) than involve....wait for it.......outsiders with ideas.
Ok rant over, any scaredy cats are more than welcome to comment.
Justin Weily http://www.gapdownunder.com/
Posted by Gap Year Downunder at 07:15 0 comments
Labels: gap year australia, independent producers, online video
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Martin Russ | Wed, 29 Jul 2009 4:17 pm
The article mentions some of the ways that interaction can enhance online video ads, but missed one emerging technology area: personalized video. The ability to change the duration, the presenter, the depth or style of presentation, the plot, or to include date or time or location-based information, can turn a 'play only' video ad into a video ad that people notice and then interact with. We've found that people interact more, have stronger brand recall, click through more, and even play video ads more than once - when they are in control of the content of the video. Our technology enables sophisticated user interaction with very low latency before the video starts playing, and so 'click-aways' during 'loading' times can be minimised. http://www.realtimecontent.com
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
chloe chadwick | Wed, 19 Aug 2009 2:07 pm
Great article Nicola - I totally agree that interactive video has been totally under used (barely used at all!)
I'm looking forward to a day when a fully interactive video advert appears - it's 100% possible now, it just needs an agency and client to make it. They'll reap the benefits.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment